The problem is not prompting

Most people do not have a prompting problem. They have a job: a messy transcript, a draft they should not send yet, a number about to become a slide. A blank chat rewards tourist questions (“write me a professional email”) and punishes the work you actually get paid for.

This pack is 40 copy-paste workflows for that work — meetings, Slack, spreadsheets, exec summaries, check-my-work — for ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude. Fill the brackets with your real material; do not start from a blank box.

It is for people who already have a job and a calendar, not a prompt collection. $9 USD. Pay what you want, floor $9.

Three workflows below are free so you can see the shape. The other 37 are in the pack.

Three free workflows

Copy a prompt, paste your real material into the brackets, then run it in ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude.

Sample A — Difficult message: delay, no, or pushback

When to use: You have to disappoint someone without becoming vague or cruel.

ChatGPT / Gemini / Claude

Help me send a clear difficult message.

I am doing one of: delay / no / pushback on scope or timeline.
State the decision in sentence one.
Give the real reason at the level I can share. Do not invent a prettier reason.
Offer the next available yes if there is one; if there is not, do not fake a consolation prize.
Keep blame off people who are not in the source.

Output:
1. Recommended approach (3 bullets)
2. Email version
3. Slack version
4. Lines I should not send (over-apology, fake certainty, dumping someone else)

Situation: [WHAT HAPPENED]
Decision: [WHAT I AM COMMUNICATING]
What I can offer: [ALTERNATIVE OR NONE]
Audience: [WHO, RELATIONSHIP]
Constraints I must not violate: [E.G. DO NOT PROMISE DATE]
Draft if I have one:
[PASTE OR “NONE”]

Sample B — Exec summary of a long document

When to use: A paper, thread, vendor deck, or policy draft is too long for the people who must act.

ChatGPT / Gemini / Claude

Write an executive summary of the source.

Audience: [ROLE LEVEL]
Length: [E.G. 250 WORDS + 6 BULLETS]
They care about: [MONEY / RISK / CUSTOMERS / TIMELINE / COMPLIANCE — PICK]
I am: [MY ROLE]

Include:
- What this is
- Recommendation or “no recommendation in source”
- Why it matters now
- Costs, dates, risks — only if present
- Open questions
- What the exec can skip

Do not add industry wisdom. Do not soften bad news that is in the source.

Source:
[PASTE OR KEY EXCERPTS]

Sample C — Check my analysis for holes

When to use: You did the thinking; you want the missing control, confound, or alternative explanation.

ChatGPT / Gemini / Claude

Stress-test this analysis.

Find:
- Conclusions that outrun the evidence
- Missing comparators or denominators
- Selection bias or incomplete time windows if hinted
- Alternative explanations
- What would falsify the claim
- What extra data would be the cheapest next check

Do not rewrite me into a more impressive story.

Question: [QUESTION]
Claim: [CLAIM]
Method and data:
[PASTE]